Competitive Analysis Template: Overview & Free Examples

Understanding your competitors is no longer a one-time exercise—it’s a continuous discipline that informs product strategy, positioning, pricing, and long-term differentiation. That’s why a competitive analysis template is such a critical tool in modern product lifecycle management.

Instead of scattered notes, ad-hoc slides, or outdated spreadsheets, a well-designed template helps teams systematically collect, compare, and interpret competitive information—so insights can actually influence decisions.

This guide explains what a competitive analysis template is, why it matters, what to include, the most common types of competitive analysis frameworks, and how to build one efficiently—manually or with AI-powered tools like Kuse.

What Is a Competitive Analysis Template?

A competitive analysis template is a structured framework used to evaluate competitors across consistent dimensions—such as features, pricing, positioning, go-to-market strategy, customer experience, and growth trajectory.

Rather than describing competitors in isolation, the template forces comparison. Every competitor is assessed using the same criteria, which makes patterns, gaps, and strategic opportunities easier to spot.

In product teams, competitive analysis templates are commonly used to:

• Inform product requirements and prioritization
• Shape positioning and messaging
• Support roadmap and launch decisions
• Align stakeholders around market reality

When maintained over time, a template becomes a living competitive intelligence asset rather than a static document.

Why Is a Competitive Analysis Template Important?

Competitive analysis is often misunderstood as “knowing what others are building.” In reality, its value lies in strategic clarity, not feature tracking.

A structured template matters because it:

Reduces bias and anecdotal thinking

‍Without a template, competitive insights often come from isolated opinions or recent news. A consistent framework forces evidence-based comparison instead of gut reactions.

Supports better product decisions

‍By mapping competitors against customer needs, pricing models, and value propositions, teams can identify where differentiation is realistic—and where it isn’t.

Creates alignment across functions

‍Product, marketing, sales, and leadership often view competitors differently. A shared template creates a single source of truth that everyone can reference.

Scales with product complexity

‍As markets grow crowded and products diversify, informal competitive tracking breaks down. Templates make competitive analysis repeatable and scalable across product lines.

What to Include in a Competitive Analysis Template

A strong competitive analysis template doesn’t just list what competitors offer—it captures why they win, who they win with, and where they’re vulnerable. The best templates also make it easy to update and compare over time. Below are the core sections worth including, with details on what “good” looks like in each one.

1. Competitor Snapshot (context that prevents misinterpretation)

Start with a quick profile that makes every other comparison more accurate. Competitors can look similar on the surface while targeting completely different customers or operating with different constraints.

Include:

Category and positioning: How they describe themselves in one sentence (their “category claim”).

Primary ICP (ideal customer profile): Company size, industry, buyer role (e.g., IT admin vs. marketing lead).

Product scope: Single-point solution, platform, suite, or add-on.

Maturity signals: Funding stage (if public), product breadth, enterprise readiness indicators (SSO, audit logs, compliance).

Geography / compliance footprint: Regions they clearly support (important for B2B).

Why it matters: without this snapshot, teams often misread a competitor’s “missing feature” as weakness—when it’s simply not in their strategy.

2. Customer Jobs-to-Be-Done and Use Cases (what users actually hire them for)

Most competitive analysis fails because it compares feature lists instead of the real job customers are trying to accomplish.

Include:

Top 3–5 customer jobs they solve (e.g., “reduce approval cycles,” “standardize brand production,” “ship faster with fewer handoffs”).

Primary workflows they support (intake → creation → approval → publish, etc.).

Where they fit in the customer’s stack (system of record vs. helper tool).

Common purchase trigger: what moment pushes customers to adopt them (scale, compliance, speed, cost pressure).

This section helps your team avoid copying features and instead compete on outcomes.

3. Value Proposition and Differentiators

You want both the stated narrative and the observed reality.

Include:

Top messaging pillars: repeated phrases on homepage, product pages, and ads.

Differentiation angle: speed, enterprise governance, “all-in-one,” AI-first, design-led, etc.

Proof points: what they use to back claims (case studies, metrics, logos).

Reality check: what you learn from reviews, demos, or trial accounts (where the story holds vs. breaks).

Pro tip: Write differentiators as “Because X, customers can Y,” not “They have feature Z.”

4. Feature and Capability Comparison

Instead of “everything they have,” focus on capabilities tied to your buyer’s evaluation criteria.

Include:

Core capabilities (the must-haves for the category)

Advanced capabilities (enterprise, scale, governance)

AI features (if relevant): what’s real automation vs. text generation

Workflow coverage: intake, creation, review, handoffs, reporting

Extensibility: APIs, webhooks, marketplace, custom fields, rules

A good template uses a consistent scoring method like:

Native / Partial / Integration-only / Not supported, plus notes.

5. Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategy

GTM analysis helps you predict competitor behavior: where they’ll push, what segments they’ll expand into, and how they’ll respond.

Include:

Primary channels: SEO, paid, partners, enterprise sales, product-led growth

Content themes: what they publish repeatedly (signals of strategic focus)

Sales motion: self-serve vs. assisted vs. enterprise-heavy

Integration strategy: which ecosystems they attach to (Microsoft, Google, Atlassian, etc.)

Retention hooks: workflows that lock-in (templates, governance, history, approvals)

6. Customer Evidence

Customer voice is where real competitive insight lives.

Include:

Top praise themes: speed, UX, reliability, collaboration

Top complaint themes: complexity, cost, onboarding, missing features

Feature requests: recurring asks (often reveals gaps and roadmap direction)

Switching triggers: why users leave or switch from them (if available)

Sources can include public reviews, forums, communities, or internal win/loss notes.

How to Build a Competitive Analysis Template

A repeatable process matters more than a perfect slide. The goal is to create a template you can update quickly and use in planning cycles, launches, and roadmap discussions.

Step 1) Define the decision you’re supporting

Start by writing one sentence:

“We’re doing this analysis to decide X.”

Examples:

Prioritize roadmap investments for the next quarter

Prepare positioning for a new launch

Evaluate entering a new segment

This clarifies what to include and prevents the template from becoming a generic “competitor encyclopedia.”

Step 2) Choose the competitor set (and label them correctly)

Use a balanced set:

Direct competitors: same category, same buyer

Indirect alternatives: different product category but same job-to-be-done

Incumbent tools: what customers use before switching (spreadsheets, Notion, email threads)

Also mark:

Who customers compare you against most often (from sales calls, demos, support, reviews).

This improves relevance and avoids wasting time on “famous companies” that aren’t real alternatives.

Step 3) Pick the framework(s) that match your goal

Don’t overload your template. Use one primary framework, and optionally one secondary view.

Examples:

Roadmap/prioritization → capability comparison + customer evidence

Positioning → value proposition + GTM messaging pillars

Experience differentiation → customer journey comparison

Market strategy → growth-share / category map + packaging trends

Framework discipline is what makes the output usable.

Step 4) Create the template structure first (before researching)

Build the skeleton headings in a doc or table, so research has a place to go.

At minimum include:

Snapshot → Jobs/Use cases → Differentiation → Capabilities → Pricing → GTM → Customer evidence → Risks → Implications

This avoids “random notes” and forces you to capture comparable data.

Step 5) Collect evidence using a consistent “source stack”

To reduce bias, gather each competitor using a repeatable evidence set:

Homepage + product pages (positioning)

Pricing page (packaging)

Docs/help center (depth + maturity)

Integrations page (ecosystem)

Public reviews/community (pain points)

Trial/demo account notes (hands-on reality)

Keep a short “evidence log” per competitor so your team can verify claims later.

Step 6) Normalize comparisons (make things truly comparable)

This step is the difference between “notes” and “analysis.”

Examples of normalization:

Convert pricing to a comparable unit (per seat per month, or typical plan tiers)

Define scoring rubric for features (Native/Partial/Integration/No)

Use the same 5–8 capability dimensions for every competitor

Describe positioning using a consistent one-sentence structure

Without normalization, templates become inconsistent and hard to interpret.

Step 7) Make it maintainable

Competitive templates fail when they’re too expensive to update.

Build a lightweight maintenance habit:

Update top 3 competitors monthly/quarterly

Track major changes: pricing, positioning, core features, integrations

Log “trigger events”: launches, acquisitions, platform shifts, new AI features

Keep a “diff” section so readers can see what changed since last update

A living template becomes a strategic asset across PLM phases.

Automate the first draft in Kuse

If your competitive inputs are scattered—screenshots, PDFs, docs, pricing pages, notes—Kuse can reduce setup time dramatically.

A practical Kuse workflow:

Upload competitor artifacts (pricing pages, product docs, review excerpts, internal notes)

Ask Kuse to generate a structured competitor table + narrative summary

Generate multiple frameworks from the same source set (SWOT + capability matrix + journey comparison)

Keep iterating as new materials arrive—without restarting the document

This works best when you treat Kuse as the place where context accumulates across lifecycle stages, rather than a one-off generator.

Conclusion

A competitive analysis template is not just a document—it’s a strategic tool that shapes how teams understand their market.

When structured well, it:

Replaces opinion with evidence

Clarifies differentiation opportunities

Aligns teams around reality, not assumptions

Whether built manually or with AI support, the goal remains the same: turning competitive noise into actionable insight that informs better product decisions throughout the lifecycle.

‍